Thanks Daniel, But when searching, I will run my "standardization" tools again before querying Lucene, so what you mentioned will not be a problem. If someone searches for mainstrasse, my tools will split it again to main and strasse, and then lucene will be able to find it.
Daniel Naber-5 wrote: > > On Monday 21 May 2007 22:05, bhecht wrote: > >> Is there any point for me to start creating custom analyzers with filter >> for stop words, synonyms, and implementing my own "sub string" filter, >> for separating tokens into "sub words" (like "mainstrasse"=> "main", >> "strasse") > > Yes: I assume your document should be found both with "strasse" and with > "mainstrasse". You will then need to put main, strasse, and mainstrasse at > the same position (setPositionIncrement(0)). If you don't do that, phrase > queries will not work anymore as expected. Thus you need an analyzer, > modifying the string before they are put in Lucene is not enough. > > Regards > Daniel > > -- > http://www.danielnaber.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/stop-words%2C-synonyms...-what%27s-in-it-for-me--tf3792510.html#a10726812 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
