Hi all, I have an ID field which I index using the KeywordAnalyzer. Since this analyzer tokenizes the entire stream as a single token, would you say the end result is the same as using any analyzer and specifying this ID field as untokenized? The latter approach does not use the analyzer so would that be more "performant" than the KeywordAnalyzer since there is no call into the analyzer's tokenization method? Is either approach acceptable or is there one "proper" way of indexing fields where the entire field value requires an exact match, i.e. untokenized? Thanks!
-Terry -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/KeywordAnalyzer-vs.-Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED-tf3811563.html#a10788664 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
