Hi Erick do u have any idea on this? jm-27 wrote: > > Hi, > > I want to make my index as small as possible. I noticed about > field.setOmitNorms(true), I read in the list the diff is 1 byte per > field per doc, not huge but hey...is the only effect the score being > different? I hardly mind about the score so that would be ok. > > And can I add to an index without norms when it has previous doc with > norms? > > Any other way to minimize size of index? Most of my fields but one are > Field.Store.NO, Field.Index.TOKENIZED and Field.TermVector.NO, one is > Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED and Field.TermVector.NO. I > tried compressing that one and size is reduced around 1% (it's a small > field), but I guess compression means worse performance so I am not > sure about applying that. > > thanks > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ways-to-minimize-index-size--tf3401213.html#a11214251 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
