Sure. It is one of the contributed analyzers. The Java docs are here: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/index.html.
Also, the source files are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/contrib/analyzers/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/cjk/ Thanks, Nina "Dmitry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] mail.com> To <java-user@lucene.apache.org> 07/22/2007 10:44 cc PM Subject Re: CJKAnalyzer - Issues with Please respond to scoring [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org Nina, can you point me to the link where I can get documentation about CJKAnalyzer. thanks, DT www.ejinz.com Search Engine Economy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nina Khosravi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <java-user@lucene.apache.org> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 11:38 PM Subject: CJKAnalyzer - Issues with scoring Hello, I am in desperate need of help on a problem with our newly deployed application that is now using the CJKAnalyzer/CJKTokenizer. Our previous release was using the WhitespaceAnalyzer and the users were extremely happy with the search results ordered by the score of the documents. We switched to the CJKAnalyzer and now the scoring is not giving them the results they are expecting. Any ideas on why using the CJKAnalyzer would be so different? Some documents that contain more instances of a search term are appearing at a lower position in the search results than those having one instance of the search term. I tried printing the explanation of the scoring but don't get any information, just the value 0.0 for each doc returned. Anyone have any ideas? I have not dug deep into this problem. I am pressed for time so was hoping someone could provide some guidance. Thanks!! Nina --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
