You will be unable to search for fields that do not exist which is what
you originally wanted to do, instead you can do something like:

-Establish the query that will select all non-null values

TermQuery tq1 = new TermQuery(new Term("field","value1"));
TermQuery tq2 = new TermQuery(new Term("field","value2"));
...
TermQuery tqn = new TermQuery(new Term("field","valuen"));
BooleanQuery query = new BooleanQuery();
booleanQuery.add(tq1,BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
booleanQuery.add(tq2,BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);
...
booleanQuery.add(tqn,BooleanClause.Occur.SHOULD);

OR perhaps a range query if your values are contiguous

Term start = new Term("field","198805");
Term end = new Term("field","198810");
Query query = new RangeQuery(start, end, true);
;

OR just use the QueryParser

Query query = QueryParser.parse(parseCriteria,
"field", new StandardAnalyzer());

-Create the QueryFilter

QueryFilter queryFilter = new QueryFilter(query);

-flip the bits

final BitSet filterBitSet = queryFilter.bits(reader);
filterBitSet.flip(0,filterBitSet.size());

Now you have a filter that contains document matching the opposite of
that specified by the query, and can use in subsequent queries

Dan



On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 09:40 -0700, Jay Yu wrote:
> 
> daniel rosher wrote:
> > Perhaps you can use a filter in the following way.
> > 
> > -Create a filter (via QueryFilter) that would contain all document that
> > do not have null values for the field
> Interesting: what does the QueryFilter look like? Isn't it just as hard 
> as finding out what docs have the null values for the field?
> I really like to know your trick here.
> > -flip the bits of the filter so that it now contains documents that have
> > null values for a field
> > -Use the filter in conjunction with subsequent queries.
> > 
> > This would also help with performance as filters are simply bitsets and
> > can cheaply be stored, generated once and used often.
> > 
> > Dan
> > 
> > On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 13:57 -0700, Jay Yu wrote:
> >> If you want performance, a better way might be to assign some special 
> >> string/value (if it's easy to create) to the missing field of docs and 
> >> index the field without tokenizing it. Then you may search for that 
> >> special value to find the docs.
> >>
> >> Jay
> >>
> >> Les Fletcher wrote:
> >>> Does this particular range query have any significant performance issues?
> >>>
> >>> Les
> >>>
> >>> Erik Hatcher wrote:
> >>>> On Jul 23, 2007, at 11:32 AM, testn wrote:
> >>>>> Is it possible to search for the document that specified field 
> >>>>> doesn't exist
> >>>>> or such field value is null?
> >>>> This is from Solr, so I'm not sure off the top of my head if this mojo 
> >>>> applies by itself, but a search for -fieldname:[* TO *] will result in 
> >>>> all documents that do not have the specified field.
> >>>>
> >>>>     Erik
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> <<This email has been scanned for virus and spam content>>
> > Daniel Rosher
> > Developer
> > 
> > 
> > d: 0207 3489 912
> > t: 0870 2020 121
> > f: 0870 2020 131
> > m: 
> > http://www.hotonline.com/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > This message is sent in confidence for the addressee only. It may contain 
> > privileged 
> > information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the 
> > addressee. 
> > Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and 
> > to advise 
> > us of any errors in transmission. Thank you.
> > 
> > hotonline ltd is registered in England & Wales. Registered office: One 
> > Canada Square, 
> > Canary Wharf, London E14 5AP. Registered No: 1904765.
> > 
> > 
> > This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - 
> > www.blackspider.com
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Daniel Rosher
Developer


d: 0207 3489 912
t: 0870 2020 121
f: 0870 2020 131
m: 
http://www.hotonline.com/






- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
This message is sent in confidence for the addressee only. It may contain 
privileged 
information. The contents are not to be disclosed to anyone other than the 
addressee. 
Unauthorised recipients are requested to preserve this confidentiality and to 
advise 
us of any errors in transmission. Thank you.

hotonline ltd is registered in England & Wales. Registered office: One Canada 
Square, 
Canary Wharf, London E14 5AP. Registered No: 1904765.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to