Hi,Patrick
        I tested use a map , get a single LuceneIndexAccessor,and get a cached 
IndexWriter ,but after do operation of update,delete,add documents,I should 
close the IndexWriter to release the Lock,it will throw Exceptions" this 
IndexWriter is closed" when other threads execute  add,update,delete 
operations.should I synchronized the IndexWriter object? It's better if you can 
 send me a demo ,thanks .

kai

>Hi Kai
>
>We keep a synchronized map of LuceneIndexAccessor instances, one instance per
>Directory.  The map is keyed on the directory path.  We then re-use
>the accessor rather than creating a new one each time.
>
>Patrick
>
On 06/08/07, Kai Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks , Patrick,
>
> It is useful. But I found a problem that I use
>
> "new LuceneIndexAccessor(accessProvider);" when a request comes in B/S,the 
> LuceneIndexAccessor.getWriter() will lose its sense,it will new an 
> IndexWriter.
>
> public IndexWriter getWriter() throws IOException {
>
>        IndexWriter result;
>
>        synchronized (this) {//here "synchronized" will lose its sense
>
>            checkClosed();
>
>            ...
>
>        if (cachedWriter != null) {
>
>               log.debug("returning cached writer");
>
>               result = cachedWriter;
>
>               writerUseCount++;
>
>            } else {
>
>               log.debug("opening new writer and caching it");
>
>               result = accessProvider.getWriter();// when new a 
> LuceneIndexAccessor Object ,it will new an IndexWriter Object
>
>               cachedWriter = result;
>
>               writerUseCount = 1;
>
>            }
>
>     }
>
> }
>
> It will also throw a Exception "cann't obtain the Lock",should I use a single 
> instance of LuceneIndexAccessor? Suppose I use a single instance of 
> LuceneIndexAccessor,how to set a different Directory or Analyzer at one time.
>
>
>
> kai
>
>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>
>
>
> >Hi Kai
>
> >
>
> >We use the Lucene Index Accessor contribution:
>
> >
>
> >http://www.nabble.com/Fwd%3A-Contribution%3A-LuceneIndexAccessor-t17416.html#a47049
>
> >
>
> >Patrick
>
>
>
> On 06/08/07, Kai Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> >          How do you solve the problems when add,update,delete documents
>
> > in muti-threads,use synchronized ?
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to