Erick Erickson wrote:
Unless it's really, really, really prohibitive or impossible,
I'd recommend regenerating your index. Messing around in
the low-level file formats is just asking for trouble. Not to
mention that you'll probably have to remanufcture your
index sometime, somewhere and hack all over again or
*hope* that your code changes would match your new
index. Whereas if you remanufacture with "kw", you'll
be sure things are consistent
Or worst of all, regenerate the index and have some other
poor soul try to figure out what the heck is going on with the
application. "It doesn't work whenever I search on the 'kw' field".
I guess, if I were looking at it, I'd have to say that either
making a new index so I could use "kw" rather than
"keyword" was valuable enough to remanufacture the
index or not valuable enough to do <G>...
Alternatively, we could just take this code and add it to
IndexReader.renameField(String old, String new) ... ;)
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
