Ok let me explain you. By warming up the reader i used to understand is that
it memorizes the index terms. Therefore subsequent queries will be answered
by using these terms. Is this correct ?



On 9/18/07, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> 18 sep 2007 kl. 08.33 skrev Shailendra Mudgal:
>
> > Whether it caches frequently used terms ?
>
> I don't understand you question?
>
> --
> karl
>
>
> >
> >
> > On 9/18/07, Karl Wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 18 sep 2007 kl. 07.12 skrev Shailendra Mudgal:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> What my goal is to understand the caching strategy.  How well this
> >>> work for repetitive queries. Is there any room available to improve
> >>> this.
> >>
> >> It is usually a loss of resources to cache results in a busy system
> >> with gaussianity distributed queries. There is a paragraph on the
> >> wiki <http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneCaveats> that explains
> >> this: Lucene is amazingly fast at searching. Rather than caching hits
> >> and paging through them, merely re-executing the query is often fast
> >> enough.
> >>
> >> I have conducted experiements with active results cache at index
> >> update time, soft/weak references and some other things I can't think
> >> of right now. Most of the time it ended up with the garbage collector
> >> going crazy with zillions of tiny soft/weak referenced instances,
> >> clock ticks spent updating results people don't that much, et c. You
> >> really need a lot of repetative queries in order for such a cache to
> >> do any good.
> >>
> >> If you are retrieving a lot of stored fields it might make sense to
> >> cache documents that are frequently accessed.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> karl
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to