"Bill Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No.  It's in another location, but perhaps I can get it tomorrow.
> On the other hand, the success when using 2.0 makes it likely to me
> that the machine isn't the problem.

Yeah good point.  Seems like a long shot (wishful thinking on my
part!).

Your errors seem to happen around the same area (~20K docs).  If you
skip the first say ~18K docs does the error still happen?  We need to
somehow narrow this down.

Or is there any way I could get a temporary account to log into this
box and try to track this down?  (If indeed it doesn't happen on an
x86 box -- I unfortunately don't have access to a PPC machine).

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to