Hi,

Your problem is that when you do a wildacrd search, Lucene expands the wildacrd term into all possible terms. So, searching for "stat*" produces a list of terms like "state", "states", "stating" etc. (It only uses terms that actually occur in your index, however). These terms are all added as OR clauses of a boolean query.

The thing is, be defult, there is a limit of 1024 caluses for a boolean query. If yuor wildacrd term expands into more than this, (which happens very easily), you get that exception you described. You can solve the issues by setting the maximum clause count yourself, using

BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(int maxClauseCount)

See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/javadoc/core/index.html for mroe info.

Bear in mind that putting a wildcard near the start of the term results in a large number of boolean clauses, which increases memory usage. This is the reason for the default limit. This limit will also affect fuzzy queries, because they are expanded in the same way.

Regards,
JB

Ruchi Thakur wrote:
Hi there. I am a new Lucene user and I have been searching the group archives but couldn't solve the problem. I have just joined a project that uses Lucene. We use the StandardAnalyzer for indexing our documents and our query is as follows when we issue a search string of t* for example:
  +t* +cont_type:pa
We get an Exception when we issue some of our wildcard text searches we get following Exception
  org.apache.lucene.search.BooleanQuery$TooManyClauses Exception : Max clause 
if 1024
Please suggest. Regards,
  Ruchi
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing.   Make Yahoo your homepage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.11/1161 - Release Date: 30/11/2007 12:12


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to