Eric,

Thanks for your advise. I implement a version count to sych the index and
search.

2007/12/27, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> If you search the mail archives, you'll find many discussions
> of the fact that when you open an index reader, it takes a
> snapshot of the index and subsequent modifications to the
> index are not available until the searcher is closed and re-opened.
>
> It is NOT a good idea to open a new reader every time you search,
> as this is an expensive operation. You have to reach some
> compromise between absolutely up-to-date results and how
> much closing/opening of your readers you can afford.
>
> A bunch of approaches are discussed in the archives, so one of
> those discussions may parallel your situation. Otherwise, you
> need to give us some idea of your constraints before anyone can
> suggest an approach.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Dec 27, 2007 8:59 AM, Zhou Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >  I encounter a strange probelm. To improve performance, I open the
> > indexreader at the start time and reuse it in later search. I have
> another
> > process running to do online indexing. The search service and indexing
> > service is accessing the same index folder. But I found out the search
> > service only returns old documents. That is to say, my index reader did
> > not
> > refresh the index folder for up-to-date index. If it acutally works like
> > that in lucene, should I try to open the index to init the indexreader
> > everytime I do search?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

Reply via email to