Sorry. Anyway, back on track. On Jan 3, 2008 3:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : Ummm, Chris, I don't know why you posted this here. We're all on > : track as far as I can tell. Or is this a trap to say that I have > : changed the subject and am now talking about thread hijacking? But, I > : suppose that would have been you. ;-) > > This is my standard reply to anyone (i notice) who thread hijacks on one > of the Lucene lists. > > In this case the message with the subject "Suggested number of fields > limit per Index" which should have been a new thread was in fact a reply > to messageId [EMAIL PROTECTED] (subject: "Is there a > mavenized Lucene bundle in the apache maven repo and what's the url?") > > http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-mavenized-Lucene-bundle-in-the-apache-maven-repo-and-what%27s-the-url--to14600221.html#a14601340 > > > : > http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack > > : > > : > Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists > : > > : > When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to > : > an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the > : > subject line of your email, other mail headers still track which thread > : > you replied to and your question is "hidden" in that thread and gets less > : > attention. It makes following discussions in the mailing list archives > : > particularly difficult. > : > See Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking > > > -Hoss > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- "Conscious decisions by conscious minds are what make reality real" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
