what do you mean by "fail"? -- there is the sortMissingLast attribute
Michael Prichard wrote:
ok... i should read the manual more often.
i went ahead and just added untokenized, unstored sort fields....
question, if I put a field in to sort of but say I have not indexed any
as of yet...will the Sort fail? For example, say I have a BCC field and
nothing has been indexed with that yet....I run a sort on BCC.....I
think it fails now...anyway around that?
On Jan 8, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Michael Prichard wrote:
Is it possible to sort on a tokenized field? For example, I break
email address into pieces, i.e.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
becomes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
michael.prichard
michael
prichard
email.com
email
so when sorting on this field I get some strange results. Do I need
to create another field just for sorting? Or are there other ways to
do it?
Thanks!
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
