On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 08:18 +1100, Antony Bowesman wrote: > These are odd. The last case in both of the above shows a slowdown compared > to > 2.1 index and version and in the first 50K queries, the 2.3 index and version > is > even slower than 2.3 with 2.1 index. It catches up in the longer result set. > > Any ideas why that might be.
Looking at the graphs I can see that the 2 threads / shared searcher is suspiciously fast at getting up to full speed. It could be because the disk-read-cache wasn't properly flushed. I'll rerun the test. I've performed an inspection of graphs for my other published measurements and they looked as expected. I'll spend some more time on it tomorrow. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
