Did your index size increase drastically? As a first step I would recommend optimizing your index if you haven't already.
-M On Feb 12, 2008 7:42 PM, Cesar Ronchese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was doing normal queries happily, seeing the results statistics come in > about 0.02 seconds. > > But then, I added a extra field to seach togheter with the normal query, > then the statistic pulled up to 0.35 seconds. That was a lot. > > example: > normal query: some test (it returns quick) > extra field query: +bookDate:"2007/02/12" some test (it returns slow. I > also > tried without +) > > Is the reduced performance normal for this case? > > > Another doubt, I thought forcing bookDate in the Search Text it would > reduce > the universe of search, then leading to quicker responses. But it didn't. > Is > there a trick to improve the speed? > > Cesar > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-multiple-field-search-performance-tp15448754p15448754.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
