I wouldn't worry about it too much, since there'll be overhead for you building up the string in the first place as well. I suspect that the time difference will be dwarfed by the indexing process. So I'd do what's easiest first.......
Erick On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:51 AM, darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Pardon the noob question. But which approach is going to be faster > over extremely large document sets. A or B? > > A) Multiple field values, Stored.NO,TOKENIZED. > word: one > word: two > word: three > > B) Single field value, Stored.NO,TOKENIZED > word: one two three > > Thanks for the tip. > Darren > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
