Yes, I didn't reopen the index. It's working fine now :) On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The files are still open by the process (deletion doesn't change this) > and hence the local IndexReader can still read the index. > > -Yonik > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:59 AM, saikrishna venkata pendyala > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am currently developing a distributed search engine using Lucene. > > > > I am able to search the multiple machines quite successfully. Each > machine > > using MultiSearcher to search the local indexes and I am creating > > RemoteSearchable object with it. > > > > The master machines searches these RemoteSearchable using > > ParallelMultiSearchable. > > > > Every thing is going fine except that, master is not able to keep track > of > > *dynamic* remote index. > > > > These is what I did, > > > > 1. Made a index remotely available. > > 2. Searching the remote index continuously(with a loop) -- worked fine > > 3. deleted the index from disk which was made remotly available. > > 4. Surprisingly, search is still working :(( (loop in step 2 continues) > > > > With few other experiments I had to come to an conclusion that somewhere > in > > step 1 or step 2 index is being cached . > > > > I am right ?? > > > > how can I slove this problem ? > > > > regards, > > Sai Krishna. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
