Hey Michael, Thanks a lot for ur time. On the JMS side I have the code which uses IndexWriter. I have to index the files that are getting uploaded. It's fine all the way if i upload ane file. But when i tried with 2-3 files, it giving me the following error.
org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain timed out: [*Lucene_store_path]/write.lock I guess this is because while indexing the second file, it tries to get the lock before the completion of the first one. I am planning to use Synchronized blocks. Is there any other way to stop this or make it synchronized? ie. to make it sure that only one indexing happens at a time? thanks a lot regards, sand Michael McCandless-2 wrote: > > > OK then this should be fine. That single machine, on receiving a JMS > message, should use a single IndexWriter for making changes to the > index (ie, it should not try to open a 2nd IndexWriter while a > previous one is still working on a previous message). > > Mike > > Sandeep K wrote: > >> >> Thanks a lot Mike, >> There will be only one machine which uses IndexWriter and its the >> JMS server. This server will first create the file in the physical >> file >> system(its Linux) >> and then index the saved file. >> >> >> Michael McCandless-2 wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sandeep K wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all.. >>>> I had a question related to the write locks created by Lucene. >>>> I use Lucene 2.3.2. Will this newwer version create locks while >>>> indexing as >>>> older ones? >>>> or is there any other way that lucene handles its operations? >>> >>> It still creates write locks, which are used to ensure only one >>> writer >>> is changing the index at a time. >>> >>>> And my another doubt is that i use JMS for lucene indexing. >>>> My App server will not do indexing but will pass the needed data for >>>> indexing to the JMS server. >>>> will there be any problem in indexing as its asynchronous? >>>> plz help me.. >>> >>> Will there be multiple machines that might open an IndexWriter and do >>> indexing, on receiving messages from the JMS server? >>> >>> What filesystem is being used to share access to the index? >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-write-locks-tp18604932p18607685.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Lucene-write-locks-tp18604932p18646366.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
