On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 21:58 +0800, Cedric Ho wrote: Toke: > > Is it the same queries that are slow each time?
[Cedric: Yes] > However I can't figure out why some of these queries are slower. Some > are complicated queries, yet others are just simple single term > queries and doesn't seems to score lots of hits. There's no > correlation between the number of terms or number of hits with the > response time. It's probably not due to filter cache miss also because > I've checked that too. Seems like we're left with range expansion and sorting... If you can fix all sorting to score, that would be an easy way of testing that part. Can you check if the slow queries are the ones with wide ranges? Or maybe run some of the slow queries without the filters at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
