As far as I know you can't do this with just one field. Why do you care? Storing two fields, one indexed but not stored and one stored but not indexed shouldn't use very many resources.
Best Erick On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Ravi L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Anshum! > > This can be possible. But, I am searching for is to do this with only one > field. > > > thanks > ravi > > On 14-Nov-08, at 1:32 PM, Anshum wrote: > > Hi Ravi, >> In that case, you could have 2 fields. One of them would be indexed (i.e. >> "foo bar") and you could use the other only to store as per your logic. >> Hope this solves your purpose. >> >> -- >> Anshum Gupta >> Naukri Labs! >> http://ai-cafe.blogspot.com >> >> The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The >> distinction is yours to draw............ >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Ravi L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I am simple question. >>> >>> I want a string to be indexed, but stored part of that string. >>> >>> For example, if my string is "foo bar", I want to index whole string("foo >>> bar") but store the first 3 characters("foo") of it. How can I do this >>> with >>> the lucene APIs? >>> >>> >>> thanks >>> ravi >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
