But isn't this pluggability / visibility issues resolved with using lucene-831? Or did you roll-your-own before 831 was available?
PabloS wrote: > > I have the same problem with cache and too many sorted fields, and had to > implement a big workaround to be able to plug my own cache implementation > in > lucene 2.3.2. What I'd really like to see in the new cache implementation > is > easier pluggability and extension of the lucene classes, which is > currently > not possible due to visibility issues. > > My 2 cents. > > 2008/11/14 Britske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> Hi, >> >> I recently saw activity on LUCENE-831 (Complete overhaul of FieldCache >> API/Implementation) which I have interest in. >> I posted previously on this with my concern that given the current >> default >> cache I sometimes get OOM-errors because I have a lot of fields which are >> sorted on, which ultimately causes the fieldcache to grow greater then >> available RAM. >> >> ultimately I want to subclass the new pluggable Fieldcache of lucene-831 >> to >> offload to disk (using ehcache or memcachedB or something) but havn't >> found >> the time yet. >> >> What I would like to know for now is if perhaps the newly implemented >> standard cache in LUCENE-831 uses another strategy of caching than the >> standard Fieldcache in Lucene. >> >> i.e: The normal cache consumes memory while generating a fieldcache for >> every document in lucene even though the document hasn't got that field >> set. >> >> Since my documents are very sparse in these fields I want to sort on it >> would differ a_lot when documents that don't have the field in question >> set >> don't add up in the used memory. >> >> So am I lucky? Or would I indeed have to cook up something myself? >> Thanks and best regards, >> >> Geert-Jan >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-831-%28complete-cache-overhaul%29--%3E-mem-use-tp20505283p20505283.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-831-%28complete-cache-overhaul%29--%3E-mem-use-tp20505283p20515498.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
