Yeah. That makes sense. Its not too hard to wrap those extra steps so I
can end up with something simpler too. Like:
iindex = InstantiatedIndex("path/to/my/index")
I'm lazy so the intermediate hoops to jump through clutter my code.
Hehe.
:)
Darren
On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 11:46 -0500, Mark Miller wrote:
> Can you start with an empty index? Then how about:
>
> // Adding these
>
> iindex = InstantiatedIndex()
> ireader = iindex.indexReaderFactory()
> isearcher = IndexSearcher(ireader)
>
> If you want a copy from another IndexReader though, you have to get that
> reader from somewhere right?
>
> - Mark
>
>
>
> Darren Govoni wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> > Thanks for the tips. Here's what I will try (psuedo-code)
> >
> > endirectory = RAMDirectory("index/dictionary.en")
> > ensearcher = IndexSearcher(endirectory)
> > // Adding these
> > reader = ensearcher.getIndexReader()
> > iindex = InstantiatedIndex(reader)
> > ireader = iindex.indexReaderFactory()
> > isearcher = IndexSearcher(ireader)
> >
> > Kind of round about way to get an InstantiatedIndex I guess,but maybe
> > there's a briefer way?
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Darren
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 10:50 -0500, Mark Miller wrote:
> >
> >> Check out the docs at:
> >> http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/contrib-instantiated/index.html
> >>
> >> There is a performance graph there to check out.
> >>
> >> The code should be fairly straightforward - you can make an
> >> InstantiatedIndex thats empty, or seed it with an IndexReader. Then you
> >> can make an InstantiatedReader or Writer, which take the
> >> InstantiatedIndex as a constructor arg.
> >>
> >> You should be able to just wrap that InstantiatedReader in a regular
> >> Searcher.
> >>
> >> Darren Govoni wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi gang,
> >>> I am trying to trace the 2.4 API to create an InstantiatedIndex, but
> >>> its rather difficult to connect directory,reader,search,index etc just
> >>> reading the javadocs.
> >>>
> >>> I have a (POI - plain old index) directory already and want to
> >>> create a faster InstantiatedIndex and IndexSearcher to query it like
> >>> before. What's the proper order to do this?
> >>>
> >>> Also, if anyone has any empirical data on the performance or reliability
> >>> of InstantiatedIndex, I'd be curious.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the tips!
> >>> Darren
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
