@Erick: Yes I changed the default field, it is "bagofwords" now. @Ian: Yes both indexes were optimized, and I didn't do any deletions. version 2.4.0
I'll repeat the experiment, just be sure. Mean while, do you have any document on Lucene fields? what I need to know is how lucene is storing field information in posting list and how it is used while searching. Thanks, Cheers, Anshul On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... > > I can for sure say that multiple copies are not index. But the number of > > fields in which text is divided are many. Can that be a reason? > > Not for that amount of difference. You may be sure that you are not > indexing multiple copies, but I'm not. Convince me - create 2 new > indexes via the 2 methods, from scratch, and count the number of docs. > And verify the size of the indexes. Does the multi GB one contain > deleted docs? Has it been optimized? > > > How is field data stored in Index and searched? I read the document on > file > > formats on lucene's web site but it was not very clear. > > All I need to know is that searching is extremely fast. Have you > taken note of Erick's suggestions and comments? > > What version of lucene are you using? > > > > -- > Ian. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Anshul Jain
