: even mention that possibility. When I debug through the call, I find the
: "explanation" in this code inside class MarkupContainsQuery (which is
: the code that gets called):
...
: // TODO SY - implement
: >>>>>>>>> return null;
: }
that's definitely not good ... but (unless i'm a *LOT* more tired then
i think) it's also not in the Lucene code base.
: This seems, um, bad, esp. as I did nothing to *decide* the type of my
: query, but merely created it from the user-entered string like this:
:
: Query query = _parser.parse(queryString);
: Query rewrite = query.rewrite(_reader);
:
: And the field _parser was created like this:
:
: Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer();
: QueryParser parser = new QueryParser("contents", analyzer);
: _parser XMLFragmentParser(parser);
I don't really understand that code ... it doesn't seem to be legal java.
is that last line suppose to be an assignment to a _parser variable from
a constructor to some class named XMLFragmentParser ?
where did you get XMLFragmentParser from? I'm seeing mentions here that
seem like they might be applicable, but i'm not fiding any code...
http://riao.free.fr/papers/15.pdf
: So -- what's the right thing to do?
I'd file a bug with whoever provided you the XMLFragmentParser and
MarkupContainsQuery classes.
-Hoss
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
