Absolutely! I have received considerable help from the community and there are so many more stuff I want to ask!
Cheers! Amin On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michael McCandless < [email protected]> wrote: > > Well, it's not yet committed. > > You can use it now by pulling the patch attached to the issue & testing it > yourself. If you do so, please report back! This is how Lucene improves. > > I'm hoping we can include it in 2.9... > > Mike > > > On Mar 13, 2009, at 6:35 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote: > > Sweet! When will this highlighter be available? Can I use this now? >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Michael McCandless < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote: >>> >>> I think that would be good. >>> >>>> >>>> >>> I'll open an issue. >>> >>> Probably a silly thing to ask but I guess there is a performance >>> >>>> implication by setting it to max value. >>>> >>>> >>> Right. And it's tough choosing a default in situations like this -- >>> performance vs losing stuff. >>> >>> However, there's a new highlighter: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1522 >>> >>> which looks like it may have promising performance and no default "loses >>> highlighted terms" limit, I think. >>> >>> Mike >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
