On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:58 PM, John Wang <john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > I fail to see the difference of exposing the api to allow for a Query > instance to be passed in vs a DocIdSet.
I was commenting specifically on your idea to allow deletion by int[] (docids) on the IndexWriter. DocIdSet is a different issue - it didn't exist when the conversation to add deleteByQuery was going on. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com In this specific case, Query is > essentially a factory to produce a DocIdSetIterator (or Scorer) Isn't it > what DocIdSet is? > Thanks > > -John > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:41 PM, John Wang <john.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Also, can we expose IndexWriter.deleteDocuments(int[] docids)? >> >> Exposing internal ids from the IndexWriter may not be a good idea >> given that they are transient. >> >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org