>Are you sure when you ran the test you called > setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(true)?
right, just a second.... this is static... we have two indices, something runs first and sets it to false... ouch, I hate statics... they make you beleive you can set them during construction... traces come in a couple of minutes. ----- Original Message ---- > From: Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 16 July, 2009 0:50:28 > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > > I think that query should rewrite to a BQ that would in turn use BS. > Are you sure when you ran the test you called > setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(true)? > > (How else can we explain that BS is in the "hung" stack trace, and > that setAllowDocsOutOfOrder alters the behavior?) > > Mike > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, eks devwrote: > > > > Mike's instrumented version is not printing anything on this query > > and it works fine with trunk version > > > > BS2 gets executed (top Query Required... +((( )))? > > > > again the Query: > > Query: +(((NAME:maria NAME:marae^0.25171682 NAME:marai^0.2365632 > NAME:marao^0.2365632 NAME:marau^0.2365632 NAME:marea^0.2834352 > NAME:marei^0.25171682 NAME:mareo^0.25171682 NAME:mareu^0.25171682 > NAME:marie^0.28577283 NAME:marieh^0.2451648 NAME:mariha^0.2583552 > NAME:mariu^0.27189124 NAME:marja^0.2834352 NAME:marje^0.2673408 > NAME:marji^0.25171682 NAME:marjo^0.25171682 NAME:marju^0.25171682 > NAME:marla^0.2673408 NAME:marle^0.25171682 NAME:marli^0.2365632 > NAME:marlo^0.2365632 NAME:maroa^0.2673408 NAME:maroe^0.25171682 > NAME:maroi^0.2365632 NAME:marou^0.2365632 NAME:marua^0.2673408 > NAME:marue^0.25171682 NAME:marui^0.2365632 NAME:maruo^0.2365632 > NAME:marye^0.2673408 NAME:maryi^0.25171682 NAME:maryo^0.25171682 > NAME:meria^0.2787888 NAME:miria^0.25835523 NAME:moria^0.25835523 > NAME:muria^0.25835523 NAME:naria^0.27648002 NAME:narie^0.25392002 > NAME:neria^0.25392002) (NAME:piekarski NAME:bekarski^0.19200002 > NAME:beugarski^0.20281483 NAME:blacharski^0.19200002 > > NAME:lekarski^0.19200002 NAME:pecarski^0.21294187 > > NAME:peikarski^0.27648002 > NAME:pekarska^0.20172001 NAME:pekarski^0.22446752 NAME:pekarskj^0.21294187 > NAME:pekarsky^0.21294187 NAME:pickarske^0.21168004 NAME:pickarski^0.22073482 > NAME:piekalski^0.23941332 NAME:piekanski^0.23941332 NAME:piekaraka^0.22533335 > NAME:piekarsci^0.29205337 NAME:piekarska^0.28421336 > NAME:piekarskie^0.25392002 > NAME:piekarsky^0.29205337 NAME:piekarzcyk^0.23232001 > NAME:piekarzki^0.29205337 > NAME:piekaski^0.24843001 NAME:piekavska^0.22533335 NAME:piekorski^0.28421336 > NAME:pielarski^0.22997928 NAME:pierarski^0.22997928 > NAME:pierkarski^0.24661335 > NAME:piesarski^0.22997928 NAME:pietarski^0.22997928 > NAME:pietkarski^0.24661335 > NAME:pikarski^0.23232001 NAME:piowarski^0.20281483 NAME:pirkarski^0.22073482 > NAME:plocharski^0.21168004 NAME:pokarski^0.20172001 > NAME:polikarski^0.20172001 > NAME:pukarski^0.20172001 NAME:pyekarska^0.26508 > NAME:siekarski^0.20281483))^2.0) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: eks dev > >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org; yo...@lucidimagination.com > >> Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 23:57:22 > >> Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > >> > >> > >> > >> it works with current trunk, 10 Minutes ago built?! > >> > >> if I put lucene from yesterday, the same symptoms like yesterday... > >> > >> Mike's instrumented version is running ... > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ---- > >> > From: Yonik Seeley > >> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > >> > Sent: Wednesday, 15 July, 2009 23:34:29 > >> > Subject: Re: speed of BooleanQueries on 2.9 > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Uwe Schindlerwrote: > >> > > And the fix only affects custom DocIdSetIterators. > >> > > >> > And custom Queries (via Scorer) since Scorer inherits from DISI. > >> > But as Mike says, it shouldn't be the issue behind in this thread. > >> > > >> > -Yonik > >> > http://www.lucidimagination.com > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
