> It's an open question whether this is more or less work than > re-parsing the document (I infer that you have the originals > available). Before trying to reconstruct the document I'd > ask how often you need to do this. The gremlins coming out > of the woodwork from reconstruction would consume a lot > of resources. For instance, could you guarantee term positions > when you re-indexed the reconstructed document? > What about stemmed words? How about synonyms? > And are you willing to spend the time tracking down the > bugs?
Well, that does sound like a ton of fun. It's not terrible for me to create new documents; the biggest issue is that they can be a bit on the large side, and I thought that if I could use what's already stored in the index rather than having to make lucene re-analyze it, maybe things could be faster/easier. It sounds like that isn't the case :) > As I said, I wouldn't go there until forced.... Yeah, that works. I'll stick with feeding documents in the good old fashioned way. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
