Very nice! Thanks for sharing :) Mike
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Jamie <[email protected]> wrote: > I forgot to point out, this is a search using the Lucene realtime search > feature. We get the reader from indexwriter.getReader() for each search. > > On 2010/03/19 01:49 PM, Jamie wrote: >> >> Hi Guys >> >> I just wanted to congratulate the Lucene guys for a fine job on 3.0!! >> >> Since we switched our indexes to using integer based range queries based >> on Date (YYMMHHSS), search speed is lightening fast and memory consumption >> has dropped considerably! >> >> Some stats: >> >> Indexed Docs: 7.2M emails >> Index Size: 24 GB (non optimized) >> Search Speed: 0.06 - 0.09 seconds (with sort YYMMHHSS date) >> >> Index stored on 4 SAS HDD hitachi RAID 10 >> 16G RAM >> 2x Xeon 4 core 2.4Gz >> OS FreeBSD 7.2 >> Filesystem UFS2 gjournal >> >> I believe we are using all search performance recommendations now. >> >> Good job! >> >> Jamie >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
