Query I its written "to do a "search within search", so that the second search is constrained by the results of the first query" we can use boolean query. So doesn't it mean the order of query ll be preserved
give me an simple example of how the docs get searched in lucene. 10 docs with 3 fields to b searched so ll it search for field1 for all 10 docs..and the result set docs ll b then searched for field2....and so far... or is it something else.. thanks, Suman On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:05:01 +0100, Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Query I >> Does the order of query play role in searching >> example:doc has fields >> rollno(pk), name, marks >> >> Query : marks=90&rollno=2&name=abc >> >> Query :rollno=2&name=abc&marks=90 >> >> which query processing will be more efficient. >> is it work like search doc field by field , it will look for doc having >> rollno=2 then from thos will look for name abc and from the selected docs >> will again look for marks param . > > I don't think it makes any difference. > > >> Query II >> which is more faster . >> a) adding one more multivalued field into current index(large) >> b) or creating a separate index for the field and searching it as a >> subindex . >> My main apprehensions is in regard to large size of index > > Probably your first option. > > > -- > Ian. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
