I am pretty sure at least some number already exists...cause I have seen mentioned several times things like '3.0 is 3 times faster than 2.4 in benchmark x' and things like that, the only thing is that numbers are not probably consolidated in one place
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Itamar Syn-Hershko <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:09 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: arguments in favour of lucene over commercial competition >> >> And I was just thinking the other day how it would be cool to >> take, say, Lucene 1.4, then some 2.* version and now the >> latest 3.* version and compare. :) Want to do it and share? >> I don't think anyone has done this before. > > I have been looking at the contrib/benchmark sources lately (for CLucene), > and I recall Grant (I think) has put a TODO requesting just that. So I guess > it is somehow possible to do with just enhancing the benchmarker? > > But if you are lazy, you can compare to old benchmarks made by others that > are posted on the Wiki (assuming you can get the same hardware). > >> >> Otis >> ---- >> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch >> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
