I see. If you made deeper mods to Lucene you could hold this index in a packed ints array (trunk only) and save some RAM.
Mike On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Li Li <fancye...@gmail.com> wrote: > 100 docs per query. Because we want to do collapse and rerank search result. > > 2010/8/5 Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>: >> This seems like a good idea. >> >> One simple way to do it is to use FileSwitchDirectory, and host *.fdx >> in RAMDirectory. You can't use compound file format though. >> >> Though, how many docs are you "typically" retrieving per search? >> >> Mike >> >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Li Li <fancye...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hi all >>> we analyze system call of lucene and find that the fdx file is >>> always read when we get field values. In my application the fdt is >>> about 50GB and fdx is about 120MB. I think it may be benifit to load >>> fdx into memory just like tii. Anyone else tried this ? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
