Adding to Uwe's comment, you may be operating under a false assumption. Lucene has no capability to update fields in a document. Period. This is one of the most frequently requested changes, but the nature of an inverted index makes this...er...tricky. Updates are really a document delete followed by a document add. And as a bonus, the new document won't even have the same internal Lucene doc id as the one it replaces.
So if you're reading a document from the index, non-stored fields are not part of the new update and your results will be...uhmmmm.... not what you expect... Best Erick On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > You cannot retrieve non-stored fields. They are analyzed and tokenized > during indexing and this is a one-way transformation. If you update > documents you have to reindex the contents. If you do not have access to > the > original contents anymore, you may consider adding a stored-only "raw > document" field, that contains everything to rebuild the indexed fields. In > our installation, we have a stored field containing the JSON/XML source > document to do this. > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Constantine Vetoshev [mailto:gepar...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2010 10:38 PM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Fields with Field.Store.NO and Field.Index.ANALYZED not > being > > indexed > > > > Thanks Erick. > > > > I finally had time to go back and look at this problem. I discovered that > the > > analyzed fields work fine for searching until I use > > IndexWriter.updateDocument(). > > > > The way my application runs, it has to update documents several times to > > update one specific field. The update code queries out Document objects > using > > a unique identifier, and updates the field. The problem is in Document > objects > > returned by the query. The querying code runs a search, and eventually > calls > > IndexSearcher.doc(int). According to the API documentation, that method > only > > returns Document objects with stored fields from the underlying index. > > > > I tried calling IndexSearcher.doc(int i, FieldSelector fieldSelector) > with > > fieldSelector set to null: the documentation states that this returns > Document > > objects with all fields, but that also only seems to return stored > fields. > > > > So my question becomes: how can I update a document which contains non- > > stored analyzed fields without clobbering the analyzed-only fields? > > Note that I do not need to update the analyzed-only fields. I have found > nothing > > helpful in the documentation. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Constantine Vetoshev > > > > > > Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I would be extraordinarily surprised if this was in Lucene, this is so > > > basic to how it works that the howls would be heard world-round <G>. > > > > > > So I'm guessing it's in your code. Could you show it to us? Or, better > > > yet, create a small, self-contained test case that illustrates your > problem? > > > > > > Also, what analyzer(s) are you using? And what do your docs look like? > > > > > > Best > > > Erick > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Constantine Vetoshev > > <gepar...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> I have a strange problem with Field.Store.NO and Field.Index.ANALYZED > > >> fields with Lucene 3.0.1. > > >> > > >> I'm testing my app with twenty test documents. Each has about ten > > >> fields. All fields except one, "Content", are set as Field.Store.YES. > > >> The "Content" field is set as Field.Store.NO and > > >> Field.Index.ANALYZED. Using Luke, I discovered that this "Content" > > >> field is not persisted to the disk, except on one document (neither > > >> the first nor the last in the list). This always happens for exactly > > >> the same document. When I examine the Document object before writing > > >> it, it has the "Content" field I expect. > > >> > > >> When I change the "Content" field from Field.Store.NO to > > >> Field.Store.YES, everything starts working. Every document has the > > >> "Content" field exactly as I expect, and searches produce the hits I > > >> expect to see. I really don't want to save the full "Content" data in > > >> the Lucene index, though. I'm baffled why Field.Store.NO results in > > >> nothing being written to the index even with Field.Index.ANALYZED. > > >> > > >> Suggestions? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> Constantine Vetoshev > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
