On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Mark Kristensson <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've run checkIndex against the index and the results are below. That net is > that it's telling me nothing is wrong with the index.
Thanks. > I did not have any instrumentation around the opening of the IndexSearcher > (we don't use an IndexReader), just around the actual query execution so I > had to add some additional logging. What I found surprised me, opening a > search against this index takes the same 6 to 8 seconds that closing the > indexWriter takes. IndexWriter opens a SegmentReader for each segment in the index, to apply deletions, so I think this is the source of the slowness. >From the CheckIndex output, it looks like you have many (296,713) unique fields names on that one large segment -- does that sound right? I suspect such a very high field count is the source of the slowness... Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
