This is the e-mail you're looking for, Steven (it wasn't forwarded to the list, apparently).
Dawid ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paul Taylor <paul_t...@fastmail.fm> Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Lucene 3.0.3 with debug information To: Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> On 29/04/2011 15:17, Dawid Weiss wrote: > lucene/Search that is taking the time, I also had another attempt using > luke > > but find it incredibly buggy and of little use > Can you expand on this too? What kind of "incredible bugs" did you see? Without feedback there is little progress, so bug reports count. Dawid Sorry, I'll withdraw that. I was getting all kinds of stacktraces and exceptions when I tried to do searches but the problem was my fault. Because I wanted to use my own analyzer I had a shells script that added it to the classpath when I ran luke, however I had put it before the ant jar and my jar built with maven also included lucene 3.0.3 and because luke 1.0.1 is packaged with 3.0.0 it was confusing it, but I didnt realize this until I notice done exception complained a lucene method was missing. But having got it working I cannot see anything to help me work out why the queries are taking too long, is it useful for this or just for refining your queries ? Paul
