Currently I'm using version 3.2.
I used already 4.x some month ago but there was to much change to that time
so I decided to go with 3.0.x and updated to 3.1 and now to 3.2.
I'm still dealing with my fieldCache OOM issue and want to understand
why things are as they are.
I have already removed/solved one "insane message" from fieldCache and
three ReadOnlyDirectoryReader Entries from fieldCache.
Only sorting produces now an entry.
So action that starts a new searcher and closes the old one (like replication)
should release cache from fieldCache through garbage collection?
Regards
Bernd
Am 21.06.2011 13:49, schrieb Erick Erickson:
Hmmm, I'm not going to even try to talk about the code itself, but I will add
a couple of clarifications:
Jetty has nothing to do with it. It's in Lucene, and it's used for sorting and
sometimes faceting. The cache is associated with a reader on a machine
used to search. When replication happens, that searcher should be closed
and any data associated with the cache is returned to the system.
Someone else will have to chime in on the underlying details<G>..
By the way, what version of Solr are you using? Because the memory
requirements for string sorting and faceting have been drastically
reduced on the trunk version. In a really rough test I've seen 75%
reductions in memory requirements (note I was doing the worst things
I could think of, so I don't necessarily expect your results to be as
drastic).
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Bernd Fehling
<bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
I'm trying to understand the logic of/behind fieldCache.
Who has written this peace of code or has good knowledge about it?
Why is it under the hood of jetty?
I see FieldCache$StringIndex with
- f_dccollection
- f_dcyear
- f_dctype
but also
- dctitle --> f_dctitle --> f_dccreator
- title --> f_dcyear
There are some entries without further reference like the first examples
and some that have references to further HashMaps like a chain.
Why is it this way, what is the purpose?
What is fieldCache doing if a server is replicated, will all old content
be cleaned up because of a new index with new content?
Regards
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
