> even high complexity as ES supports lucene-like query nesting via JSON
That sounds interesting. Where is it described in the ES docs? Thanks. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Peter Karich <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > its not really fair to compare NRT of Solr to ElasticSearch. > ElasticSearch provides NRT for distributed indices as well... also when > doing heavy indexing Solr lacks real NRT. > > The only main disadvantages of ElasticSearch are: > * only one (main) committer > * no autowarming > > >> the ES team in the end has found it good as a storage but difficult to > extend for a lucene expert. > > The nice thing with ES is that you can e.g. create lucene queries with > even high complexity as ES supports lucene-like query nesting via JSON. > Also when implementing server side stuff you can take advantage of full > lucene power. > > Ah, before I forgot it: it is very important to test the software > yourself. Do not trust me or anybody else :), also the software should > fit to your environment, requirements + team! > > Regards, > Peter. > > > PS: here is my different comparison: > http://karussell.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/elasticsearch-vs-solr-lucene/ > > >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Shashi Kant <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I had posted this earlier on this list, hope this provides some answers >>> >>> http://engineering.socialcast.com/2011/05/realtime-search-solr-vs-elasticsearch/ >> Except it's an out of date comparison. >> We have NRT (near real time search) in Solr now. >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/NearRealtimeSearch >> >> -Yonik >> http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > -- > http://jetsli.de news reader for geeks > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
