Hi, Lucene is storing it's data pretty much flat. You have Documents representing a seach result. This Documents are created during the indexing process you have to implement. For XML data I would recommend to store the Xpath of the indexed data in a field in the lucene documents in order to get the nodes addessed again in the XML tree.
Best Regards Lutz -------------------------- ...via my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld ----- Originalnachricht ----- Von: Johannes.Lichtenberger [mailto:johannes.lichtenber...@uni-konstanz.de] Gesendet: Saturday, July 28, 2012 05:44 PM An: java-user@lucene.apache.org <java-user@lucene.apache.org> Betreff: Revisioned Lucene Index Hello, I'm currently working on revisioned index structures for a treebased storage system[1] and I want to provide an index-structure for fulltext search (more or less on XML text-nodes). Either I'm going to implement a Radix/PATRICIA-tree or I'm opting for Lucene. I thought about adding a node <=> Field mapping , that would probably be sufficient as we do not need a tree-structure in order to support revisioning strategies (full dump, incremental, differential). However, I guess Lucene uses some kind of tree-structure itself though perhaps it would be more appropriate to map these nodes to our "nodes". Any suggestions? kind regards, Johannes [1] https://github.com/JohannesLichtenberger/sirix --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
