This was part of the rationale for introducing the XML Query Parser: 1) An extensible query syntax that is expressive enough to represent the full range of Lucene functions (filters, moreLikeThis etc) 2) Serializable 3) Language independent 4) Decouples the holder of query criteria from the implementations that execute the query.
Cheers Mark ________________________________ From: Trejkaz <trej...@trypticon.org> To: Lucene Users Mailing List <java-user@lucene.apache.org> Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2012, 9:43 Subject: Re: Lucene 4.0, Serialization On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:33 PM, BIAGINI Nathan <nathan.biag...@altanis.fr> wrote: > I need to send a class containing Lucene elements such as `Query` over the > network using EJB and of course this class need to be serialized. I marked > my class as `Serializable` but it does not seems to be enough: > > org.apache.lucene.search.TermQuery is not Serializable > > Indeed, when i read the javadoc of the last stable release of Lucene (4.0), > i can see that `TermQuery` does not implement Serializable, `Query` neither. > What i don't understand is why those classes used to implement > `Serializable` in the last release (3.6.1), and why it's no longer the case? Although I am curious about this myself, couldn't you just send a query string? TX --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
