On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> If you use StandardAnalyzer, you are in trouble unless you use > StandardAnalyzer with Version.LUCENE_23 and you are using non-western > language. If you change your code to use Version.LUCENE_41, you have to > reindex. > > Thank you Uwe. We index only english and numbers. In that case Version.LUCENE_41 wouldn't affect right? Because I don't think I can use Version.LUCENE_23 from the 4.1 code base. Also, I am remembering something now. We had used CJK analyzer in the 2.3 version, for the japanese and chinese version. How about using the same in 4.1. Thanks in advance. > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ramprakash Ramamoorthy [mailto:youngestachie...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 8:38 AM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Migrate/Upgrade frommLucene 2.3 > > > > Dear all, > > > > We are moving our codebase from Lucene 2.3 to 4.1. Also, we are > > migrating the older indices from 2.3 to 3.6 and then to 4.1. Would be > glad if > > you can share some do's and dont's during migrating the indices, which > you > > have experienced before. > > > > Also, the 2.3 indices were written using a standard analyzer > then and the > > current indices will use standard analyzer, version_41. Hope there > shouldn't > > be a problem reading the migrated indices because of the analyzer version > > change? Thanks in advance. Glad if you can help. > > > > -- > > With Thanks and Regards, > > Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, > > India. > > +91 9626975420 > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- With Thanks and Regards, Ramprakash Ramamoorthy, India, +91 9626975420
