Thanks a lot Elisabeth

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Elisabeth Adler
<elisabeth.ad...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm not sure what you mean with how to index a group. You basically index
> all documents, and then group them for the results.
> To stay on the books example: you index books including information about
> the author. So each document in the index is a book. But in your result
> list, you want to display authors. So you group by author.
>
> For the details about how to group, the package documentation (
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-ALPHA/grouping/index.html) should
> cover
> what you need.
> Best,
> Elisabeth
>
> On 27 May 2013 14:13, raj <rajeshmohan.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wasnt able to find any guidelines on how to add a Group while indexing.
> > There is a user guide and demo code for Facet which shows this. Can you
> > please show how to add a Group while indexing?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rajesh
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:55 PM, raj <rajeshmohan.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Elisabeth,
> > >
> > > Thanks. Let me go through the links
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rajesh
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Elisabeth Adler <
> > > elisabeth.ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Rajesh,
> > >> This entry explains it quite well:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8550818/whats-the-difference-between-grouping-and-facet-in-lucene-3-5
> > >> Best,
> > >> Elisabeth
> > >>
> > >> On 27 May 2013 11:16, raj <rajeshmohan.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I was seeing that Lucene supports both Groups and Facets. But I was
> > >> finding
> > >> > it difficult to understand the difference between both.
> > >> >
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1421 - Says "Ability
> to
> > >> Group
> > >> > search results by Field". So, is this by existing Fields that we add
> > >> while
> > >> > indexing or something different as in FacetFields in Facets?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> > Rajesh
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to