I am trying to implement Lucene on high volume. We implemented Lucene 4.1,
The search with Facets is very slow and consume high amount of RAM and
cause Swapping. We have 7gb of index, it includes 70 millions of Documents
(pretty short doc). The Search (inc. Facets) takes 30-60 seconds which is
way too long for our needs. We ran it on x3550 (Intel) server , 12gb. We
have other processes running on the same machine. Is it reasonable? is it
realistic to expect 1-3 seconds search of both hits and facets (we have 7-8
facets)? in some cases the number of hits is 50Millions or so. Thank you,
hope it is okay to email you this question.
We are using Lucene (not Solr -- I don't know why; we will review moving to
Solr soon).
We are allocating 4-6 gb for Java maximum (we wish we could limit it to 2-3
gb max or for short time).



On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Michael McCandless <mikemcc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Oded,
>
> Can you email java-user@lucene.apache.org and ask this?
>
> Are you using the lucene facet module (not Solr)?  If so, it should not
> consume that much RAM, unless you have a high number of unique facet
> labels.  And 30-60 seconds seems too long, unless you are running a
> particularly hard query.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Oded Sofer <yotamch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael, I am trying to implement Lucene on high volume. We
>> implemented Lucene 4.1, The search with Facets is very slow and consume
>> high amount of RAM and cause Swapping. We have 7gb of index, it includes 70
>> millions of Documents (pretty short doc). The Search (inc. Facets) takes
>> 30-60 seconds which is way too long for our needs. We ran it on x3550
>> (Intel) server , 12gb. We have other processes running on the same machine.
>> Is it reasonable? is it realistic to expect 1-3 seconds search of both hits
>> and facets (we have 7-8 facets)? in some cases the number of hits is
>> 50Millions or so. Thank you, hope it is okay to email you this question.
>> Yotam Oded Sofer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This message was sent to you from your Google profile. The sender does
>> not have your email address.
>>
>> If you no longer wish to receive messages from your Google profile, you
>> may edit your 
>> settings<https://profiles.google.com/112759599082866346694/edit>
>> .
>>
>
>

Reply via email to