Well, you have supplied a bit more info - good - but I still can't
spot the problem.  Unless someone else can I suggest you post a very
small self-contained program that demonstrates the problem.


--
Ian.


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Ankit Murarka
<ankit.mura...@rancoretech.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>         The problem does not seem to be getting solved.
>
> As mentioned, I am indexing each line of each file.
> The sample text present inside LUKE is
>
> <am name="notification" value="10"/>\
> <type="DE">\
> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>>Size of list  array::0\
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> org.com.dummy,INFO,<< Still figuring out how to run
>>>,SERVER,100.100.100.100:8080,EXCEPTION,10613349
> INSIDE POST OF Listener\
>
> In my Luke, I can see the text as "INSIDE POST OF Listener" .. This is
> present in many files.
>
> /*Query is +contents:INSIDE contents:POST */              --/The field name
> is contents. Same analyzer is being used. This is a boolean query./
>
> To test, I indexed only 20 files. In 19 files, this is present.
>
> The boolean query should give me a hit for this document.
>
> BUT IT IS RETURNING ME NO HIT..
>
> If I index the same files WITHOUT line by line then, it gives me proper
> hits..
>
> But for me it should work on Indexes created by Line by Line parsing also.
>
> Please guide.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/13/2013 4:41 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
>>
>> remedialaction != "remedial action"?
>>
>> Show us your query.  Show a small self-contained sample program or
>> test case that demonstrates the problem.  You need to give us
>> something more to go on.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ian.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Ankit Murarka
>> <ankit.mura...@rancoretech.com>  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>          I am aware of that link and I have been through that link many
>>> number of times.
>>>
>>> Problem I have is:
>>>
>>> 1. Each line is indexed. So indexed line looks something like "<attribute
>>> name="remedial action" value="Checking"/>\"
>>> 2. I am easily firing a phrase query on this line. It suggest me the
>>> possible values. No problem,.
>>> 3. If I fire a Boolean Query with "remedialaction" and "Checking" as a
>>> must/must , then it is not providing me this document as a hit.
>>> 4. I am using StandardAnalyzer both during the indexing and searching
>>> time.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/13/2013 2:31 PM, Ian Lea wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Should be straightforward enough.  Work through the tips in the FAQ
>>>> entry at
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#Why_am_I_getting_no_hits_.2F_incorrect_hits.3F
>>>> and post back if that doesn't help, with details of how you are
>>>> analyzing the data and how you are searching.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ian.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Ankit Murarka
>>>> <ankit.mura...@rancoretech.com>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>                  I have 2 different usecases.
>>>>> I am trying to provide both boolean query and phrase search query in
>>>>> the
>>>>> application.
>>>>>
>>>>> In every line of the document which I am indexing I have content like :
>>>>>
>>>>> <attribute name="remedial action" value="Checking"/>\
>>>>>
>>>>> Due to the phrase search requirement, I am indexing each line of the
>>>>> file
>>>>> as
>>>>> a new document.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now when I am trying to do a phrase query (Did you Mean, Infix Analyzer
>>>>> etc,
>>>>> or phrase suggest) this seems to work fine and provide me with desired
>>>>> suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Problem is :
>>>>>
>>>>> How do I invoke boolean query for this. I mean when I verified the
>>>>> indexes
>>>>> in Luke, I saw the whole line as expected is indexed.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, if user wish to perform a boolean query say suppose containing
>>>>> "remedialaction" and "Checking" how do I get this document as a hit. I
>>>>> believe since I am indexing each line, this seems to be bit tricky.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please guide.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Ankit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Ankit Murarka
>>>
>>> "What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared
>>> with
>>> what lies within us"
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Ankit Murarka
>
> "What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared with
> what lies within us"
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to