Thanks for the answers, and thanks for the changes to load doc values to
disk, it will be nice to use a supported codec.

Upgrading our indexes is not an option, as they are very large.

Sean


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Sean Bridges <sean.brid...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Is there a supported DocValuesFormat that doesn't load all the values
> into
> > ram?
>
> Not with any current release, but in lucene 4.5 if all goes well, the
> official implementation will work that way (I spent essentially the
> last entire week on this and committed it yesterday).
>
> Integrating new ideas into the official format takes a good amount of
> effort: lots of documentation and testing and so on, because we have
> to live with supporting that format for a long time, all the way until
> 5.9.
> .
> >
> > We can't reindex every time we upgrade lucene since our indexes are too
> > large.  Should we copy the code from DiskDocValuesFormat and call it
> > CustomDiskDocValuesFormat, and give CustomDiskDocValuesFormat a new name
> so
> > that when we upgrade lucene, we won't use an incompatible version of
> > DiskDocValuesFormat?
> >
>
> You can certainly maintain your own codec components: you can even
> name them the same thing as long as you put your .jar file first in
> the classpath (thats how SPI works: first one wins).
>
> But its not really a cure-all, its some work either way: codec APIs
> themselves change too, so you have to deal with that on upgrade (e.g.
> DocValuesProducer gets a new method in 4.5 as its now capable of
> representing missing values, and the iterators in DocValuesConsumer
> now provide null when a document is missing a value).
>
> Or, you can avoid reindexing by using addIndexes as I suggested (just
> buy a few big chips of RAM for the upgrade).
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to