Hmm, why are you indexing such immense documents? In 3.x Lucene never sanity checked the offsets, so we would silently index negative (int overflow'd) offsets into e.g. term vectors.
But in 4.x, we now detect this and throw the exception you're seeing, because it can lead to index corruption when you index the offsets into the postings. If you really must index such enormous documents, maybe you could create a custom tokenizer (derived from StandardTokenizer) that "fixes" the offset before setting them? Or maybe just doesn't even set them. Note that position can also overflow, if your documents get too large. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:36 PM, John Cecere <john.cec...@oracle.com> wrote: > I'm having a problem with Lucene 4.5.1. Whenever I attempt to index a file > > 2GB in size, it dies with the following exception: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: startOffset must be non-negative, and > endOffset must be >= startOffset, > startOffset=-2147483648,endOffset=-2147483647 > > Essentially, I'm doing this: > > Directory directory = new MMapDirectory(indexPath); > Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(); > IndexWriterConfig iwc = new IndexWriterConfig(Version.LUCENE_45, analyzer); > IndexWriter iw = new IndexWriter(directory, iwc); > > InputStream is = <my input stream>; > InputStreamReader reader = new InputStreamReader(is); > > Document doc = new Document(); > doc.add(new StoredField("fileid", fileid)); > doc.add(new StoredField("pathname", pathname)); > doc.add(new TextField("content", reader)); > > iw.addDocument(doc); > > It's the IndexWriter addDocument method that throws the exception. In > looking at the Lucene source code, it appears that the offsets being used > internally are int, which makes it somewhat obvious why this is happening. > > This issue never happened when I used Lucene 3.6.0. 3.6.0 was perfectly > capable of handling a file over 2GB in this manner. What has changed and how > do I get around this ? Is Lucene no longer capable of handling files this > large, or is there some other way I should be doing this ? > > Here's the full stack trace sans my code: > > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: startOffset must be non-negative, and > endOffset must be >= startOffset, > startOffset=-2147483648,endOffset=-2147483647 > at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.OffsetAttributeImpl.setOffset(OffsetAttributeImpl.java:45) > at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardTokenizer.incrementToken(StandardTokenizer.java:183) > at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter.incrementToken(StandardFilter.java:49) > at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.LowerCaseFilter.incrementToken(LowerCaseFilter.java:54) > at > org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.FilteringTokenFilter.incrementToken(FilteringTokenFilter.java:82) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.DocInverterPerField.processFields(DocInverterPerField.java:174) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.DocFieldProcessor.processDocument(DocFieldProcessor.java:248) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterPerThread.updateDocument(DocumentsWriterPerThread.java:254) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:446) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1551) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1221) > at > org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.addDocument(IndexWriter.java:1202) > > Thanks, > John > > -- > John Cecere > Principal Engineer - Oracle Corporation > 732-987-4317 / john.cec...@oracle.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
