Can you summarize what you observed? What was the net throughput difference on Windows vs Linux?
Was everything else identical (same hardware, same JVM, etc.)? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 5:23 AM, sree <mail2sreed...@gmail.com> wrote: > We tried a standalone program to index 50 documents from 100 threads > concurrently. We executed the program for 1000 threads with 10 mins delay to > avoid jvm warming issue as you suggested in last post. > Also we are running with restricted heap size i.e 124MB ( as our product is > running in linux with a shared heapsize of 124MB for lucene.) in both > windows and linux. We can see that there is a performance difference in > Windows and in linux. > > Please find attached result, where we have an average time taken per thread > except the first run (since it may have the jvm warming impact) > > Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx > <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/file/n4118525/Lucene_win_linux_Diff.xlsx> > > Please share your thought... > > thanks > Sreedeep > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Suggestions-Required-110-Concurrency-users-indexing-on-Lucene-dont-finish-in-200-ms-tp4116625p4118525.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
