Thanks for the response. I had seen references to this explanation in other areas but for older versions and was hoping it changed in 4.4. I guess since it's schema-less it really can't be fixed for the masses and must be fixed through customization.
Thanks again, Matt On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Lucene is schema-less. Because of that QueryParser cannot handle numeric > fields out of the box, because it cannot know what fields are numeric. > Because of this it just creates a TermRangeQuery which will never hit any > documents of a field indexed as LongField. You can directly use > NumericRangeQuery to create the range query (recommended). Alternatively > you can subclass QueryParser and override the getRangeQuery protected > methods to create the correct query type (NumericRangeQuery) based on the > field name. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Petersen [mailto:mdpe...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 9:44 PM > > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Problem with numeric range query syntax in lucene 4.4.0 > > > > Hi > > > > I'm trying to submit a lucene query string to my index to return a data > based > > on a numeric range. I'm using the syntax provided in the Query Parser > > Syntax document but the results I get indicate that the query is not > working > > correctly. Below is a unit test that proves that the range query does > not > > work, at least in this configuration. > > > > @Test > > public void test_lucene_numeric_range_query() throws IOException, > > ParseException { > > Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer(Version.LUCENE_44); > > IndexWriterConfig config = new > IndexWriterConfig(Version.LUCENE_44, > > analyzer); > > Directory directory = new RAMDirectory(); > > IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(directory, config); > > > > Field longField1 = new LongField("longField1", 0L, > Field.Store.YES); > > Field longField2 = new LongField("longField2", 0L, > Field.Store.YES); > > > > for (long i = 1; i < 101; i++) > > { > > Document doc = new Document(); > > longField1.setLongValue(i); > > longField2.setLongValue(i); > > > > doc.add(longField1); > > doc.add(longField2); > > > > writer.addDocument(doc); > > } > > > > writer.commit(); > > IndexReader reader = DirectoryReader.open(writer, false); > > IndexSearcher searcher = new IndexSearcher(reader); > > > > Query query = new QueryParser(Version.LUCENE_44, "", > > analyzer).parse("longField1:[51 TO 75]"); > > > > TopDocs docs = searcher.search(query, 100); > > > > Assert.assertEquals(docs.totalHits, 25); > > > > } > > > > > > Is there something wrong with the query I'm submitting, or the way I'm > > setting up the searcher, or something else? Or does submitting a query > in > > this way for a numeric field not work? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Matt > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
