It's not safe also opening an IndexWriter on the client side. But I agree, supporting tree topology would make sense; it seems like we just need a way for the ReplicationClient to also be a Replicator. It seems like it should be possible, since it's clearly aware of the SessionToken it's pulled from the original Replicator.
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Christoph Kaser <lucene_l...@iconparc.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying out the (highly useful) index replicator module (with the > HttpReplicator) and have stumbled upon a question: > It seems, the IndexReplicationHandler is working directly on the index > directory, without using an indexwriter. Could there be a problem if I open > an IndexWriter on the client side? > Usually, this should not be needed, as only the master should be changed, > however if I want to implement a "tree topology", I need an IndexWriter on a > non-leaf client, because the IndexRevision that I need to publish needs one. > > Regards, > Christoph > > -- > Dipl.-Inf. Christoph Kaser > > IconParc GmbH > Sophienstrasse 1 > 80333 München > > www.iconparc.de > > Tel +49 -89- 15 90 06 - 21 > Fax +49 -89- 15 90 06 - 49 > > Geschäftsleitung: Dipl.-Ing. Roland Brückner, Dipl.-Inf. Sven Angerer. HRB > 121830, Amtsgericht München > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
