On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 11:56 +0200, Shruthi wrote: Toke: > Is 20 second an acceptable response time for your users? > > Shruthi: Its definitely not acceptable. PFA the piece of code that we > are using..Its taking 20seconds. That’s why I drafted this ticket to > see where I was going wrong.
Indexing 1000 documents/sec in Lucene is quite common, so even taking into account large documents, 20 seconds sounds like quite a bit. > Shruthi: Well, its two stage process: Client is looking at > historical data based on a parameters like names, dates,MRN, fields > etc.. SO the query actually gets the data set fulfilling the > requirements > > If client is interested in doing a text search then he would pass the > search phrase on the result set. So it is not possible for a client to perform a broad phrase search to start with. And it sounds like your DB-queries are all simple matching? No complex joins and such? If so, this calls even more for a full Lucene-index solution, which handles all aspect of the search process. > - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
