Try a cURL statement like: curl " http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.id=doc33&captureAttr=true&defaultField=text"; -F "myfile=@testRTFVarious.rtf
first, then work up to the post.jar bits... Two cautions: 1> make sure to commit afterwards. Something like http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update?commit=true will work 2> uncomment the line: <dynamicField name="*" type="string" multiValued="true" /> in your schema.xml (and restart solr). Also, track your output to see if it went through successfully. Best, Erick On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Shruthi <sse...@imedx.com> wrote: > Hi , > > Finally I have been able to convince my team to go for indexing all > documents first and then search rather than do on the fly indexing. I have > set up Solr on my machine but unable to index RTF'f. I have followed the > tutorial..but no where RTF is mentioned..Can someone please help me.. > I tried following options: > Java -Dtype=application/RTF -jar post.jar *.RTF > Java -Dtype=application/rtf -jar post.jar *.RTF > Java -Dtype=text/RTF -jar post.jar *.RTF > > Thanks, > Shruthi Sethi > SR. SOFTWARE ENGINEER > iMedX > OFFICE: > 033-4001-5789 ext. N/A > MOBILE: > 91-9903957546 > EMAIL: > sse...@imedx.com > WEB: > www.imedx.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Heyde [mailto:xoodrena...@gmx.de] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:56 AM > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: AW: NewBie To Lucene || Perfect configuration on a 64 bit server > > Hey, > > I have several notes about your process. > > 1st: How you select the documents you are passing to the index for further > searching? Maybe it is more straight forward to "find" them on you > programming language? > 2nd: Storage is cheap, buy a hard-disk and store the overall index. The > most > expensive operation is the indexing and the first read access (caching on > Lucene / OS level). Imagine what happens when you build the index and > delete > it afterwards just for a "simple" search operation on a subset of your > documents. > > Cheers, Ralf > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: rulinma [mailto:ruli...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Mai 2014 03:14 > An: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: RE: NewBie To Lucene || Perfect configuration on a 64 bit server > > 1000+ is solr, lucenen more fast. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NewBie-To-Lucene-Perfect-configuration-on > -a-64-bit-server-tp4136871p4138215.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
